Home › Intelligence › Brief
VULNERABILITY BRIEF🟡 Medium Vulnerability

Server-Side Request Forgery (CVE-2026-64849) in MLflow Webhook Engine Enables Authenticated Data Exposure

A server‑side request forgery (SSRF) flaw (CVE‑2026‑64849) in MLflow’s webhook test endpoint allows authenticated users to make arbitrary outbound requests, potentially exposing internal services. The vulnerability highlights the importance of input‑validation and service‑account monitoring for audit‑ready control assurance.

LiveThreat™ Intelligence · 📅 October 30, 2026· 📰 zerodayinitiative.com
🟡
Severity
Medium
VU
Type
Vulnerability
🎯
Confidence
High
🏢
Affected
1 sector(s)
✅
Actions
5 recommended
📰
Source
zerodayinitiative.com

Server-Side Request Forgery (CVE-2026-64849) in MLflow Webhook Engine Enables Authenticated Data Exposure

What It Is — MLflow (v ≥ 2.10.0) contains a server‑side request forgery (SSRF) flaw in its webhook test endpoint. An authenticated attacker can supply an unchecked URI, causing the MLflow service account to issue arbitrary outbound HTTP requests. The vulnerability can be used to probe internal services, exfiltrate data reachable from the host, or pivot to other internal resources. CVSS 6.8 (moderate) with network‑vector, low‑complexity, required authentication, and high confidentiality impact. MLflow has published a patch (see GitHub PR #24258).

Affected Products — MLflow (all versions prior to the security‑release referenced in the advisory).

Why It Matters for Trust & Control Assurance — The issue underscores the need for rigorous input‑validation controls and continuous monitoring of service‑account activity—an objective that maps to multiple frameworks (e.g., NIST CSF Protect, ISO 27001 A.12).

Recommended Actions —

  • Apply the MLflow update that fixes CVE‑2026‑64849 immediately.
  • Restrict webhook test functionality to trusted IP ranges or disable it if not required.
  • Enforce least‑privilege for the MLflow service account and audit its outbound traffic.
  • Add logging and alerting for unusual outbound requests from the MLflow host.
  • Incorporate the remediation into your secure‑development and configuration‑management controls.

Source: Zero Day Initiative Advisory – ZDI‑26‑846

📰 Original Source
http://www.zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-26-846/ ↗

This LiveThreat Intelligence Brief is an independent analysis. Read the original reporting at the link above.

From the Verisq platform · Trust Operations

Answer one control objective. Answer ten frameworks.

The Verisq Common Framework is a spine of 84 control objectives that SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, CMMC, HIPAA, PCI DSS, HITRUST, GDPR, ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF map onto — each graded honestly. Satisfy an objective once and every framework that recognizes it lights up at its real strength.

See how the Verisq Common Framework works →