Home › Intelligence › Brief
VULNERABILITY BRIEF🟠 High Vulnerability

SQL Injection Vulnerabilities Found in POMS oretnom23v1.0 Web Application

Exploit‑DB disclosed multiple SQL injection flaws in POMS oretnom23v1.0, allowing attackers to run arbitrary queries against the backend database. The issue highlights the need for robust secure‑coding controls and continuous evidence collection for audit readiness.

LiveThreat™ Intelligence · 📅 October 02, 2026· 📰 exploit-db.com
🟠
Severity
High
VU
Type
Vulnerability
🎯
Confidence
High
🏢
Affected
1 sector(s)
✅
Actions
3 recommended
📰
Source
exploit-db.com

POMS oretnom23v1.0 – Multiple SQL Injection Vulnerabilities Discovered

What Happened — Researchers publishing on Exploit‑DB (ID 52684) identified several un‑sanitized input fields in the POMS oretnom23v1.0 web application that allow classic SQL injection (SQLi). An attacker can craft a request that injects arbitrary SQL commands, potentially reading, modifying, or deleting backend database records.

Why It Matters for Trust & Control Assurance

  • Demonstrates a gap in the secure‑coding control objective: without systematic input validation, applications fail a core assurance test that spans many frameworks (e.g., NIST CSF 2.0, ISO 27001).
  • Continuous control‑assurance programs require evidence that secure‑development policies are enforced and that code reviews capture injection risks.
  • Mapping this finding to a control‑mapping capability helps organizations produce defensible audit evidence that the “protect against injection attacks” control is operating.

Who Is Affected — SaaS providers, internal web‑application teams, and any organization that deploys the POMS oretnom23v1.0 package (commonly in manufacturing execution or inventory‑management contexts).

Recommended Actions

  • Conduct an immediate code review of all input handling routines in POMS oretnom23v1.0.
  • Apply parameterized queries or prepared statements to replace any dynamic SQL concatenation.
  • Update the application to the latest patched version (if available) and document the remediation in your control‑mapping repository.
  • Record remediation evidence (commit hashes, test results) to satisfy continuous monitoring requirements.

Source: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/52684

Technical Notes

  • Attack vector: crafted HTTP requests containing malicious SQL payloads.
  • No CVE identifier has been assigned; the vulnerability is catalogued only in Exploit‑DB.
  • A successful exploit can lead to full database compromise, including credential tables and business data.

Source: https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/52684

📰 Original Source
https://www.exploit-db.com/exploits/52684 ↗

This LiveThreat Intelligence Brief is an independent analysis. Read the original reporting at the link above.

From the Verisq platform · Trust Operations

Answer one control objective. Answer ten frameworks.

The Verisq Common Framework is a spine of 84 control objectives that SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, CMMC, HIPAA, PCI DSS, HITRUST, GDPR, ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF map onto — each graded honestly. Satisfy an objective once and every framework that recognizes it lights up at its real strength.

See how the Verisq Common Framework works →