HomeIntelligenceBrief
VULNERABILITY BRIEF🔴 Critical Vulnerability

Critical SSRF in MLflow (CVE‑2026‑64849) Enables Unauthenticated Cloud Credential Theft

CVE‑2026‑64849 is a server‑side request forgery vulnerability in MLflow < 3.15.0 that attackers are exploiting to reach cloud metadata services and harvest temporary credentials. The flaw highlights gaps in access‑control and monitoring that SOC 2 auditors now scrutinize for AI/ML workloads.

LiveThreat™ Intelligence · 📅 August 20, 2026· 📰 securityaffairs.com
🔴
Severity
Critical
VU
Type
Vulnerability
🎯
Confidence
High
🏢
Affected
2 sector(s)
Actions
5 recommended
📰
Source
securityaffairs.com

Critical SSRF in MLflow (CVE‑2026‑64849) Enables Unauthenticated Cloud Credential Theft

What It Is – MLflow versions < 3.15.0 contain a server‑side request forgery (SSRF) flaw (CVE‑2026‑64849) that lets an unauthenticated attacker force the MLflow server to issue arbitrary HTTP requests.

Exploitability – The vulnerability scores 9.3 (CVSS v3.1) and is already being weaponised in the wild. WatchTowr reports active scanning and exploitation within hours of the CVE’s public disclosure.

Affected Products – MLflow (open‑source machine‑learning workflow manager) prior to version 3.15.0.

Why It Matters for Compliance & Audit Readiness

  • SOC 2 Access Controls – Unauthenticated SSRF bypasses logical access boundaries, violating the CC6.1 (Logical Access) and CC6.2 (Least Privilege) criteria.
  • Continuous Monitoring – Detecting anomalous outbound requests from MLflow servers provides concrete audit evidence that controls are operating as intended.
  • Defensible Audit Trail – Demonstrating timely patching and evidence of network‑segmentation mitigations satisfies the CC7.1 (Change Management) and CC7.2 (Vulnerability Management) requirements that auditors now expect from AI/ML workloads.

Recommended Actions

  • Upgrade all MLflow deployments to ≥ 3.15.0 immediately.
  • Enforce outbound‑traffic restrictions (e.g., deny access to cloud metadata endpoints) via network policies or host‑based firewalls.
  • Enable logging of all outbound HTTP requests from MLflow nodes and feed these logs into a SIEM for continuous control monitoring.
  • Review and tighten IAM policies for any cloud credentials that could be exposed via metadata services.
  • Document the remediation steps in your SOC 2 evidence repository to demonstrate due diligence.

Source: SecurityAffairs – CISA adds an MLflow flaw to its KEV catalog

📰 Original Source
https://securityaffairs.com/197558/hacking/u-s-cisa-adds-a-mlflow-flaw-to-its-known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog.html

This LiveThreat Intelligence Brief is an independent analysis. Read the original reporting at the link above.

From the Verisq platform · SOC 2 Readiness

Access is where most audits get tested.

Verisq AI Trust Operations maps incidents like this to your access controls and collects the evidence continuously, keeping your SOC 2 posture defensible.

See where you'd stand with Verisq AI Trust Operations →