Home › Intelligence › Brief
VULNERABILITY BRIEF🔴 Critical Vulnerability

Critical SSRF in MLflow (CVE‑2026‑64849) Enables Unauthenticated Cloud Credential Theft

CVE‑2026‑64849 is a server‑side request forgery vulnerability in MLflow < 3.15.0 that attackers are exploiting to reach cloud metadata services and harvest temporary credentials. The flaw highlights gaps in access‑control and monitoring that SOC 2 auditors now scrutinize for AI/ML workloads.

LiveThreat™ Intelligence · 📅 August 20, 2026· 📰 securityaffairs.com
🔴
Severity
Critical
VU
Type
Vulnerability
🎯
Confidence
High
🏢
Affected
2 sector(s)
✅
Actions
5 recommended
📰
Source
securityaffairs.com

Critical SSRF in MLflow (CVE‑2026‑64849) Enables Unauthenticated Cloud Credential Theft

What It Is – MLflow versions < 3.15.0 contain a server‑side request forgery (SSRF) flaw (CVE‑2026‑64849) that lets an unauthenticated attacker force the MLflow server to issue arbitrary HTTP requests.

Exploitability – The vulnerability scores 9.3 (CVSS v3.1) and is already being weaponised in the wild. WatchTowr reports active scanning and exploitation within hours of the CVE’s public disclosure.

Affected Products – MLflow (open‑source machine‑learning workflow manager) prior to version 3.15.0.

Why It Matters for Compliance & Audit Readiness

  • SOC 2 Access Controls – Unauthenticated SSRF bypasses logical access boundaries, violating the CC6.1 (Logical Access) and CC6.2 (Least Privilege) criteria.
  • Continuous Monitoring – Detecting anomalous outbound requests from MLflow servers provides concrete audit evidence that controls are operating as intended.
  • Defensible Audit Trail – Demonstrating timely patching and evidence of network‑segmentation mitigations satisfies the CC7.1 (Change Management) and CC7.2 (Vulnerability Management) requirements that auditors now expect from AI/ML workloads.

Recommended Actions

  • Upgrade all MLflow deployments to ≥ 3.15.0 immediately.
  • Enforce outbound‑traffic restrictions (e.g., deny access to cloud metadata endpoints) via network policies or host‑based firewalls.
  • Enable logging of all outbound HTTP requests from MLflow nodes and feed these logs into a SIEM for continuous control monitoring.
  • Review and tighten IAM policies for any cloud credentials that could be exposed via metadata services.
  • Document the remediation steps in your SOC 2 evidence repository to demonstrate due diligence.

Source: SecurityAffairs – CISA adds an MLflow flaw to its KEV catalog

📰 Original Source
https://securityaffairs.com/197558/hacking/u-s-cisa-adds-a-mlflow-flaw-to-its-known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog.html ↗

This LiveThreat Intelligence Brief is an independent analysis. Read the original reporting at the link above.

From the Verisq platform · Trust Operations

Access is where most audits get tested.

Verisq AI Trust Operations maps incidents like this to your access controls and collects the evidence continuously, keeping your trust posture defensible.

See where you'd stand with Verisq AI Trust Operations →