Home › Intelligence › Brief
BREACH BRIEF🟠 High Breach

41.8M User Accounts Exposed in piZap Photo‑Editing Service Breach

In December 2017, the online photo‑editing platform piZap suffered a breach that exposed over 41 million email addresses, personal details and SHA‑1‑hashed passwords. The incident highlights the need for robust credential‑storage controls and continuous audit evidence for compliance.

LiveThreat™ Intelligence · 📅 October 07, 2026· 📰 haveibeenpwned.com
🟠
Severity
High
BR
Type
Breach
🎯
Confidence
High
🏢
Affected
2 sector(s)
✅
Actions
3 recommended
📰
Source
haveibeenpwned.com

41.8M User Accounts Exposed in piZap Photo‑Editing Service Breach

What Happened — In December 2017 the online photo‑editing site piZap was breached. A dark‑web dump released in February 2019 contained ≈ 42 million unique email addresses, names, genders, geographic locations, social‑media profile links, usernames, and, for accounts created directly on piZap, passwords stored as SHA‑1 hashes.

Why It Matters for Trust & Control Assurance

  • Weak password hashing (SHA‑1) signals a gap in credential‑storage controls that a continuous‑control‑assurance program must detect and remediate.
  • The exposure of personal identifiers demonstrates the need for documented data‑protection policies and evidence of their enforcement to satisfy audit requirements.
  • Demonstrable remediation (e.g., stronger KDFs, MFA) provides defensible proof of due‑diligence for regulators and partners.

Who Is Affected — Consumer‑focused SaaS platforms, web applications that allow direct registration or social‑login authentication, and any service handling large volumes of personal data.

Recommended Actions

  • Replace SHA‑1 hashes with a modern password‑hashing algorithm (bcrypt, Argon2) and force password resets for all affected users.
  • Deploy multi‑factor authentication for both native and social‑login accounts.
  • Conduct a credential‑storage control review, capture evidence of the new hashing process, and map findings to your audit framework.

Technical Notes — Attack vector unknown; breach likely stemmed from inadequate protection of authentication data. Exposed data types: email, name, gender, location, social‑media profile links, usernames, and SHA‑1 password hashes. Source: [Have I Been Pwned – piZap breach]

📰 Original Source
https://haveibeenpwned.com/api/v3/breach/piZap ↗

This LiveThreat Intelligence Brief is an independent analysis. Read the original reporting at the link above.

From the Verisq platform · Trust Operations

Access is where most audits get tested.

Verisq AI Trust Operations maps incidents like this to your access controls and collects the evidence continuously, keeping your trust posture defensible.

See where you'd stand with Verisq AI Trust Operations →