Home › Intelligence › Brief
VULNERABILITY BRIEF🟡 Medium Vulnerability

Integrity Check Vulnerability in Oracle Java SE (CVE‑2015‑4902) Risks Software Trust

A remote‑attacker‑usable flaw in Oracle Java SE’s integrity‑check routine (CVE‑2015‑4902) is flagged in CISA’s KEV catalog. The issue underscores the need for continuous software‑integrity controls and audit‑ready evidence of secure configuration.

LiveThreat™ Intelligence · 📅 October 07, 2026· 📰 nvd.nist.gov
🟡
Severity
Medium
VU
Type
Vulnerability
🎯
Confidence
High
🏢
Affected
1 sector(s)
✅
Actions
3 recommended
📰
Source
nvd.nist.gov

Integrity Check Vulnerability in Oracle Java SE (CVE‑2015‑4902) Risks Software Trust

What It Is – An unspecified flaw in Oracle Java SE’s integrity‑check routine can allow a remote attacker to tamper with the runtime environment. The vulnerability is tracked as CVE‑2015‑4902 and is listed in CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.

Exploitability – The vulnerability is publicly disclosed and flagged as “exploited in the wild” by CISA, indicating active use by threat actors. No public proof‑of‑concept code is released, but the KEV status implies a realistic attack path.

Affected Products – Oracle Java SE (all supported versions at the time of the advisory).

Why It Matters for Trust & Control Assurance

  • Software integrity controls – The flaw highlights the need for continuous verification that critical runtimes have not been altered, a core control objective that maps to many frameworks (e.g., NIST CSF 2.0 Protect).
  • Evidence of secure configuration – Demonstrating that integrity checks are enabled and logged provides defensible audit evidence for regulators and enterprise buyers.
  • Supply‑chain diligence – Java SE is a common component in SaaS and on‑prem applications; a breach in its integrity can cascade to downstream services, making third‑party assurance essential.

Recommended Actions

  • Verify that the latest Oracle Java SE patches are applied; upgrade to a version where the integrity‑check vulnerability is mitigated.
  • Enable and regularly review integrity‑verification logs (e.g., JAR signing, checksum validation) to detect unauthorized modifications.
  • Map this finding to the “software integrity and secure configuration” control area in your control framework and capture remediation evidence for audit readiness.

Source: CISA KEV – CVE‑2015‑4902

📰 Original Source
https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2015-4902 ↗

This LiveThreat Intelligence Brief is an independent analysis. Read the original reporting at the link above.

From the Verisq platform · Trust Operations

Answer one control objective. Answer ten frameworks.

The Verisq Common Framework is a spine of 84 control objectives that SOC 2, ISO 27001, NIST CSF, CMMC, HIPAA, PCI DSS, HITRUST, GDPR, ISO 42001 and NIST AI RMF map onto — each graded honestly. Satisfy an objective once and every framework that recognizes it lights up at its real strength.

See how the Verisq Common Framework works →